Exploring the Telephony Denial of Service (TDoS) Q&A

Interviewed with Mark Collier, CTO and VP of Engineering at Securelogix to better understand the topic of Telephony Denial of Service (TDoS).

I briefly interviewed Mark Collier, CTO and VP of Engineering at SecureLogix (Www.securelogix.com) on the topic of Telephony Denial of Service (TDoS). Mark just completed the Hacking Exposed: UC and VoIP book, which covers TDoS and related topics. Mark has been working in this space for some 20 years, maintains the www.voipsecurityblog.com blog on this topic, and is a frequent speaker at conferences on this topic.

Hi Mark, I have seen a lot of press on Telephony Denial of Service (TDoS). What is it?

Telephony Denial of Service or TDoS is a flood of unwanted, malicious inbound calls. The calls are usually into a contact center or other part of an enterprise, which depends heavily on voice service. Examples are financial contact centers, Intensive Care Units (ICUs) and emergency rooms in hospitals, and public services such as 911. The intent of the attacker is disruption or financial gain through extortion.

As far as the press is concerned, let me add a couple of articles on the topic that could be interesting for my readers:

Can you give some examples of real world attacks?

The “Payday loan SCAM” is probably the best known. In this scam, the attacker obtained a list of individuals who have taken out short-term “payday” loans. The attacker calls the victim’s place of business, states that the individual has not paid their loan (which is often true), and that if they don’t pay, the attacker will embarrass and harass them by repeatedly calling their place of business. This attack has progressed to where the attackers are also just calling ICUs and emergency rooms and making the same threat. When the victim or enterprise refuses to pay, which is what they should do, they are hit with a barrage of calls. The calls are generated through a combination of cheap labor pools and automated call generation. Amazingly, over $5,000,000 has been paid out on this scam. The attacker provides a pre-paid, anonymous debit card, upon which the victim adds funds.

There have been a number of attacks and press information about attacks against emergency services. Some intentional and some unintentional (a famous rapper sent a tweet to his 600,000 followers to call in complaints to the local sheriffs office, when bled over to the emergency services). We have also worked with multiple financial enterprises, whose contact centers were victims of TDoS or call pumping attacks (which created a TDoS condition).

What makes these attacks possible?

It is very easy to anonymously generate calls into the public voice network. It is very easy to spoof your calling number, so the victims don’t know where the calls are coming from. Attackers can use cheap labor pools and hard-to-trace VoIP applications such as Skype to generate the calls. More likely though, the attackers can use a variety of automated techniques to generate the calls. With inexpensive SIP access to the network, free and powerful IP PBX software like Asterisk, call generators, the ability to spoof the calling number, and ready information on the Internet, make it easy to generate automated TDoS. The Hacking Exposed: UC and VoIP book covers this process in detail, including a sample attack. Turnkey TDoS tools such as those discussed by Dancho Danchev can also be used.

What do you recommend enterprises do about these attacks?

The right place in an enterprise to address these threats is on the perimeter, before they saturate the trunks and overwhelm the internal IP PBX or contact center system. Keep in mind that most of the attacks enter an enterprise through TDM trunks. While SIP trunks are being deployed rapidly, they account for perhaps 10-15% of the overall trunks, so any solution has to address both. IP PBXs have some basic capability, but it is very limited. Session Border Controllers (SBCs) can provide some mitigation, but they only work for SIP and really only look at the underlying packets, not the malicious calls. Companies like SecureLogix offer application-level security solutions, which monitor all types of trunks, and look at all the signaling and media, to identify the calls that are part of the TDoS attack and remove them from the network.

Pierluigi Paganini

(Security Affairs –  TDOScybercrime)

Pierluigi Paganini

Pierluigi Paganini is member of the ENISA (European Union Agency for Network and Information Security) Threat Landscape Stakeholder Group and Cyber G7 Group, he is also a Security Evangelist, Security Analyst and Freelance Writer. Editor-in-Chief at "Cyber Defense Magazine", Pierluigi is a cyber security expert with over 20 years experience in the field, he is Certified Ethical Hacker at EC Council in London. The passion for writing and a strong belief that security is founded on sharing and awareness led Pierluigi to find the security blog "Security Affairs" recently named a Top National Security Resource for US. Pierluigi is a member of the "The Hacker News" team and he is a writer for some major publications in the field such as Cyber War Zone, ICTTF, Infosec Island, Infosec Institute, The Hacker News Magazine and for many other Security magazines. Author of the Books "The Deep Dark Web" and “Digital Virtual Currency and Bitcoin”.

Recent Posts

SECURITY AFFAIRS MALWARE NEWSLETTER ROUND 84

Security Affairs Malware newsletter includes a collection of the best articles and research on malware…

6 minutes ago

Security Affairs newsletter Round 563 by Pierluigi Paganini – INTERNATIONAL EDITION

A new round of the weekly Security Affairs newsletter has arrived! Every week, the best…

38 minutes ago

Fintech firm Figure disclosed data breach after employee phishing attack

Fintech firm Figure confirmed a data breach after hackers used social engineering to trick an…

21 hours ago

U.S. CISA adds a flaw in BeyondTrust RS and PRA to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog

The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) adds a flaw in BeyondTrust RS and…

22 hours ago

Suspected Russian hackers deploy CANFAIL malware against Ukraine

A new alleged Russia-linked APT group targeted Ukrainian defense, government, and energy groups, with CANFAIL…

1 day ago

New threat actor UAT-9921 deploys VoidLink against enterprise sectors

A new threat actor, UAT-9921, uses the modular VoidLink framework to target technology and financial…

2 days ago

This website uses cookies.