• Home
  • Cyber Crime
  • Cyber warfare
  • APT
  • Data Breach
  • Deep Web
  • Digital ID
  • Hacking
  • Hacktivism
  • Intelligence
  • Internet of Things
  • Laws and regulations
  • Malware
  • Mobile
  • Reports
  • Security
  • Social Networks
  • Terrorism
  • ICS-SCADA
  • POLICIES
  • Contact me
MUST READ

Athlete or Hacker? Russian basketball player accused in U.S. ransomware case

 | 

U.S. CISA adds Citrix NetScaler ADC and Gateway flaw to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog

 | 

UK NCA arrested four people over M&S, Co-op cyberattacks

 | 

PerfektBlue Bluetooth attack allows hacking infotainment systems of Mercedes, Volkswagen, and Skoda

 | 

Qantas data breach impacted 5.7 million individuals

 | 

DoNot APT is expanding scope targeting European foreign ministries

 | 

Nippon Steel Solutions suffered a data breach following a zero-day attack

 | 

Iranian group Pay2Key.I2P ramps Up ransomware attacks against Israel and US with incentives for affiliates

 | 

Hackers weaponize Shellter red teaming tool to spread infostealers

 | 

Microsoft Patch Tuesday security updates for July 2025 fixed a zero-day

 | 

Italian police arrested a Chinese national suspected of cyberespionage on a U.S. warrant

 | 

U.S. CISA adds MRLG, PHPMailer, Rails Ruby on Rails, and Synacor Zimbra Collaboration Suite flaws to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog

 | 

IT Worker arrested for selling access in $100M PIX cyber heist

 | 

New Batavia spyware targets Russian industrial enterprises

 | 

Taiwan flags security risks in popular Chinese apps after official probe

 | 

U.S. CISA adds Google Chromium V8 flaw to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog

 | 

Hunters International ransomware gang shuts down and offers free decryption keys to all victims

 | 

SECURITY AFFAIRS MALWARE NEWSLETTER ROUND 52

 | 

Security Affairs newsletter Round 531 by Pierluigi Paganini – INTERNATIONAL EDITION

 | 

North Korea-linked threat actors spread macOS NimDoor malware via fake Zoom updates

 | 
  • Home
  • Cyber Crime
  • Cyber warfare
  • APT
  • Data Breach
  • Deep Web
  • Digital ID
  • Hacking
  • Hacktivism
  • Intelligence
  • Internet of Things
  • Laws and regulations
  • Malware
  • Mobile
  • Reports
  • Security
  • Social Networks
  • Terrorism
  • ICS-SCADA
  • POLICIES
  • Contact me
  • Home
  • Digital ID
  • Security
  • Trustwave vs Mozilla community for MITM Digital Certificate

Trustwave vs Mozilla community for MITM Digital Certificate

Pierluigi Paganini February 14, 2012

After the attacks against certification authorities such as VeriSign, Comodo and DigiNotar the level of confidence in the model based on certificates is in sharp decline. There is widespread accusations addressed to the PKI paradigm (public key infrastructure ) which is based on the concept to request to trusted and credited third parties to guarantee on the identity of an entity in the digital world.
On more than one occasion have been identified vulnerabilities to the model and were shown the dangers arising from impairment of such architectures, the risks that pose a serious threat from private sector to the government one. Unfortunately, the criticism of the model are not moved for technical reasons, we are faced with an impressive business, the monetization of our digital identity.

The news that we are going to discuss is undoubtedly disconcerting and raises serious doubts about the trustworthiness of the trusted “third party”, main components of the PKI model. Digital Certificate Authority (CA) Trustwave revealed that it has issued a digital certificate that enabled an unnamed private company to spy on SSL protected connections within its corporate network. The news has literally shocked the Mozilla community that has immediately requested to remove the CA’s root certificate from Firefox.

The certificate issued by Trustwave is recognized as a subordinate root and enabled to sign digital certificates for virtually any domain on the Internet. Trustwave has decided to make a public declaration on the event to reassure their customers. According the declaration of the company it has been updated their legal repository (https://ssl.trustwave.com/CA). It has been  revoked subordinate root.

This single certificate was issued for an internal corporate network customer and not to a ‘government’, ‘ISP’ or to ‘law enforcement’. It was to be used within a private network within a data loss prevention (DLP) system. The subordinate certificate was subject to a Certification Practice Statement (CPS), Subscriber Agreement and Relying Party Agreement crafted by Trustwave after an audit of the customer physical security, network security, and security policies.
The system was created using dedicated hardware device designed for SSL proxy and acceleration, with a FIPS-140-2 Level 3 compliant Hardware Security Module (HSM) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardware_security_module) for subordinate root storage and for the purpose of private key generation of the re-signed SSL certificates. This means that once the trusted subordinate root was placed into the device it could not be extracted.

The statement remarks two main aspects:

  • the subordinate root could not be stolen or abused because it was stored in a HMS (Hardware Security Module) device used for the management of digital keys. It’s usage guarantees that it’s impossible to estract the keys from the device.  These modules are physical devices that traditionally come in the form of a plug-in card or an external TCP/IP security device, their goals are:
    • onboard secure generation
    • onboard secure storage
    • use of cryptographic and sensitive data material
    • offloading application servers for complete asymmetric and symmetric cryptography.

    HSMs provide both logical and physical protection of these materials from non-authorized use and potential adversaries.  Trustwave declared that the issuing of subordinate roots to private companies has been done with the purpose to allow inspection of the SSL-encrypted traffic that passes through their networks. Anyway the CA decided to stop issuing this type of certificates in the future, revoking the existent ones.

  • the company has performed physical security audits to make sure that the system can’t be used to intercept SSL-encrypted (Secure Sockets Layer-encrypted) traffic on different network.

The unsubstantiated allegations are charges from many quarters, the presence of the certificate could be used to generate ad hoc SSL certificates that would allow to extract the keys to use them elsewhere . These allegations were promptly rejected by the company, Brian Trzupek, Trustwave’s vice president for managed identity and authentication said:
“Nor Could the subordinate root keys ever get exported from the device.”

Mozilla’s community seems not accept this motivations and it is currently debating whether the issuing of such certificates represents a serious breach of the policy implemented by the CA. To preserve users’ security the community is oriented to exclude the certificate from its software.

Several users are asking Mozilla to remove Trustwave’s root certificate from Firefox and Thunderbird because domain name owners were not aware that Trustwave was re-signing certificates in their name through a subordinate root.

In my opinion Trustwave has managed the situation in a reasonable way and even correct the observations of the Mozilla community has produced excessive worry. The company has operated in absolute transparency when applying the corrections required, proceding with the certificate revocation.

What I do not agree is the different approach followed by the company in the public an governmental and private sectors. Cyber ​​threats are transverse to the areas which are inextricably linked and the exploit of a vulnerability in the private sector could have serious repercussions in other fields.

Another aspect on which I have strong doubts is that a certification authority can distribute to everyone, although in a safe manner, ‘weak CA’ certificates.
A similar procedure is in my opinion contrary to any reasonable security policy and may expose organizations to significant risks.

Pierluigi Paganini


facebook linkedin twitter

CA Certification Authority cyber threat cyber threats Digital Certificate digital ID Hacking MITM PKI

you might also like

Pierluigi Paganini July 11, 2025
U.S. CISA adds Citrix NetScaler ADC and Gateway flaw to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog
Read more
Pierluigi Paganini July 09, 2025
Hackers weaponize Shellter red teaming tool to spread infostealers
Read more

leave a comment

newsletter

Subscribe to my email list and stay
up-to-date!

    recent articles

    Athlete or Hacker? Russian basketball player accused in U.S. ransomware case

    Uncategorized / July 11, 2025

    U.S. CISA adds Citrix NetScaler ADC and Gateway flaw to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog

    Hacking / July 11, 2025

    UK NCA arrested four people over M&S, Co-op cyberattacks

    Cyber Crime / July 10, 2025

    PerfektBlue Bluetooth attack allows hacking infotainment systems of Mercedes, Volkswagen, and Skoda

    Hacking / July 10, 2025

    Qantas data breach impacted 5.7 million individuals

    Data Breach / July 10, 2025

    To contact me write an email to:

    Pierluigi Paganini :
    pierluigi.paganini@securityaffairs.co

    LEARN MORE

    QUICK LINKS

    • Home
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber warfare
    • APT
    • Data Breach
    • Deep Web
    • Digital ID
    • Hacking
    • Hacktivism
    • Intelligence
    • Internet of Things
    • Laws and regulations
    • Malware
    • Mobile
    • Reports
    • Security
    • Social Networks
    • Terrorism
    • ICS-SCADA
    • POLICIES
    • Contact me

    Copyright@securityaffairs 2024

    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
    Cookie SettingsAccept All
    Manage consent

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities...
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    Non-necessary
    Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
    SAVE & ACCEPT