• Home
  • Cyber Crime
  • Cyber warfare
  • APT
  • Data Breach
  • Deep Web
  • Digital ID
  • Hacking
  • Hacktivism
  • Intelligence
  • Internet of Things
  • Laws and regulations
  • Malware
  • Mobile
  • Reports
  • Security
  • Social Networks
  • Terrorism
  • ICS-SCADA
  • POLICIES
  • Contact me
MUST READ

Interlock ransomware group deploys new PHP-based RAT via FileFix

 | 

Global Louis Vuitton data breach impacts UK, South Korea, and Turkey

 | 

Experts uncover critical flaws in Kigen eSIM technology affecting billions

 | 

Spain awarded €12.3 million in contracts to Huawei

 | 

Patch immediately: CVE-2025-25257 PoC enables remote code execution on Fortinet FortiWeb

 | 

Wing FTP Server flaw actively exploited shortly after technical details were made public

 | 

SECURITY AFFAIRS MALWARE NEWSLETTER ROUND 53

 | 

Security Affairs newsletter Round 532 by Pierluigi Paganini – INTERNATIONAL EDITION

 | 

McDonald’s job app exposes data of 64 Million applicants

 | 

Athlete or Hacker? Russian basketball player accused in U.S. ransomware case

 | 

U.S. CISA adds Citrix NetScaler ADC and Gateway flaw to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog

 | 

UK NCA arrested four people over M&S, Co-op cyberattacks

 | 

PerfektBlue Bluetooth attack allows hacking infotainment systems of Mercedes, Volkswagen, and Skoda

 | 

Qantas data breach impacted 5.7 million individuals

 | 

DoNot APT is expanding scope targeting European foreign ministries

 | 

Nippon Steel Solutions suffered a data breach following a zero-day attack

 | 

Iranian group Pay2Key.I2P ramps Up ransomware attacks against Israel and US with incentives for affiliates

 | 

Hackers weaponize Shellter red teaming tool to spread infostealers

 | 

Microsoft Patch Tuesday security updates for July 2025 fixed a zero-day

 | 

Italian police arrested a Chinese national suspected of cyberespionage on a U.S. warrant

 | 
  • Home
  • Cyber Crime
  • Cyber warfare
  • APT
  • Data Breach
  • Deep Web
  • Digital ID
  • Hacking
  • Hacktivism
  • Intelligence
  • Internet of Things
  • Laws and regulations
  • Malware
  • Mobile
  • Reports
  • Security
  • Social Networks
  • Terrorism
  • ICS-SCADA
  • POLICIES
  • Contact me
  • Home
  • Breaking News
  • Malware
  • Security
  • Google goes on the Offensive versus Ad Injectors

Google goes on the Offensive versus Ad Injectors

Pierluigi Paganini April 03, 2015

Google has announced serious actions to prevent ad injectors that compromise the integrity of users’ browsing experience across the globe.

Google has declared “war” on programs that compromise the integrity of users’ browsing experience across the globe.  In a recent blog post featured on Google’s Online Security Blog, Google has released information surrounding research that they have been performing during the first quarter of 2015.

“To increase awareness about ad injectors and the scale of this issue, we’ll be releasing new research on May 1 that examines the ad injector ecosystem in depth.”

This research was performed as a collaborative effort between Google and researchers at the University of California Berkeley; but before we dive into the numbers and other statistical information, you may be curious as to what exactly is an ad injector.  To keep it simple, an

To keep it simple, an ad injector is a program that performs its injection activities between even legitimate websites, and the user’s web browser.

What these programs do can be drawn from their classification: They display advertisements on the web pages that the user browses to.  They either inject brand new advertisements on web pages that are often legitimate websites that otherwise would not display advertisements if not for the ad injector program being active.  However, they can also modify existing advertisements found (again, on any website, legitimate or illegitimate) with other advertisements specified by the program.

While ad injectors are generally classified as PUPs (Potentially Unwanted Programs) and weigh more toward the benign side of software (as opposed to explicitly being declared to be malware), the consequences of such programs being active can be quite severe.  They are often bundled with legitimate programs, therefore, most users are not aware of what is going on behind the scenes when installing a legitimate program with an ad injector bundled within the “legitimate” installer.  However, many ad injectors can be classified as malware, and perform more malicious activities or rather, be a part of a much more severe issue (i.e. higher-severity classification of malware such as a component of a Trojan).

Advertisements have also been leveraged as exploitation vectors for malicious authors, especially in recent times, such as the recent rebirth and exponential growth of ransomware found in-the-wild.

Google has already had preventive measures in place to combat ad injectors, general malware, known malicious websites, and other threats that we commonly encounter as we browser the web, but the data gathered and analyzed during the Google-led ad injector research reveals greater insight into these programs, especially in terms of calculating overall statistics.

ad injectors 2

Google released some initial metrics surrounding their research, which encompassed the analysis of over 100 million logged pageviews across websites owned by Google.  This data was acquired from users browsing the web utilizing three browsers: Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, and Internet Explorer. These users were located around the globe, and ad injectors were discovered on two operating systems, Microsoft’s Windows operating system and Apple’s Mac operating system.

Out of the total number of unique users that browsed the tracked Google-owned sites during this study, it was determined that more than 5% of these users were infected with at least one ad injector.  Google stated that of the 5% of affected users, 1/3 of them had at least four ad injectors installed on their device, and ½ of them had at least two ad injectors installed.

Google determined that thirty-four percent of Google Chrome extensions found to be injecting advertisements could be classified, as Google put it, “as outright malware”.  Google also stated that they have already found approximately 192 Chrome extensions that attempted to deceive users, and that these extensions affected approximately 14 million users.  Google has since disabled these benign or malicious extensions, and we can only speculate that there are many more extensions that will perish under Google’s crusade versus ad injectors.

More granular information, and an official release of Google’s research regarding ad injectors is expected to be released on May 1 of this year.

About the Author Michael Fratello

Michael Fratello is a Security Engineer employed by CipherTechs, Inc., a privately held information security services provider located in downtown Manhattan, New York.  Specializing in Penetration Testing and Digital Forensics, Michael, a St. John’s University graduate majoring in Computer Security Systems, has developed a passion for information security and often spends his free time studying, programming, and researching the exponentially growing number of threats found in-the-wild today.

Edited by Pierluigi Paganini

(Security Affairs –  ad injectors, malware)


facebook linkedin twitter

you might also like

Pierluigi Paganini July 14, 2025
Interlock ransomware group deploys new PHP-based RAT via FileFix
Read more
Pierluigi Paganini July 14, 2025
Global Louis Vuitton data breach impacts UK, South Korea, and Turkey
Read more

leave a comment

newsletter

Subscribe to my email list and stay
up-to-date!

    recent articles

    Interlock ransomware group deploys new PHP-based RAT via FileFix

    Cyber Crime / July 14, 2025

    Global Louis Vuitton data breach impacts UK, South Korea, and Turkey

    Data Breach / July 14, 2025

    Experts uncover critical flaws in Kigen eSIM technology affecting billions

    Security / July 14, 2025

    Spain awarded €12.3 million in contracts to Huawei

    Intelligence / July 14, 2025

    Patch immediately: CVE-2025-25257 PoC enables remote code execution on Fortinet FortiWeb

    Security / July 13, 2025

    To contact me write an email to:

    Pierluigi Paganini :
    pierluigi.paganini@securityaffairs.co

    LEARN MORE

    QUICK LINKS

    • Home
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber warfare
    • APT
    • Data Breach
    • Deep Web
    • Digital ID
    • Hacking
    • Hacktivism
    • Intelligence
    • Internet of Things
    • Laws and regulations
    • Malware
    • Mobile
    • Reports
    • Security
    • Social Networks
    • Terrorism
    • ICS-SCADA
    • POLICIES
    • Contact me

    Copyright@securityaffairs 2024

    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
    Cookie SettingsAccept All
    Manage consent

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities...
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    Non-necessary
    Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
    SAVE & ACCEPT