Cyber warfare

US intelligence claims Russian hackers probed electoral networks in 21 US states

According to the US intelligence, Russian hackers tried to compromise electoral networks in 21 unnamed US states, but voting tallies hadn’t been hacked.

According to Homeland Security officials, the attack against the 2016 Presidential election was more sophisticated than first thought.

In a public hearing into the Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential election held by the US Senate Intelligence Committee, the Department of Homeland Security director of the cyber division, Dr Samuel Liles, claimed that the electoral networks in 21 US states were probed by hackers a month before the election. The systems in a few of states were hacked.

The Department of Homeland Security director avoided disclosing the name of the US states. Russian hackers tried to exploit software vulnerabilities in the target systems by using a number of publicly known exploits.

The hackers aimed to get access into election registration and management systems, but not the vote-tallying equipment.

“A small number of the networks were successfully exploited,” he said. “They made it through the door.”

Russian hackers presidential election 2016Russian hackers presidential election 2016

Liles’ claims were also supported by Jeanette Manfra, acting director of Homeland Security’s national protection and programs directorate.
Jeanette Manfra confirmed that hackers breached some websites and computer networks, but voting tallies from the 2016 election hadn’t been hacked.

“In September, our products at the classified and unclassified levels reported that we had no indication that adversaries or criminals were planning cyber operations against the U.S. election infrastructure that would change the outcome of the coming U.S. election. Further, we assessed that multiple checks and redundancies in U.S. election infrastructure—including diversity of systems, non-Internet connected voting machines, pre-election testing, and processes for media, campaign, and election officials to check, audit, and validate results—make it likely that cyber manipulation of U.S. election systems intended to change the outcome of a national election would be detected.” she said.

The vice chairman of the committee, Senator Mark Warner (D-VA) didn’t agree that secrecy about the name of hacked states, same opinion was shared by Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL).

The Panelist Bill Priestap, assistant director of the FBI’s counterintelligence division, said that his agency has not assessed the alleged Russian influence to the result of the 2016 Presidential election.

“Russia’s 2016 Presidential election influence effort was its boldest to date in the United States,” he told the committee.

“Russia’s activities included efforts to discredit Secretary Clinton and to publicly contrast her unfavorably with President Trump. This Russian effort included the weaponization of stolen cyber information, the use of Russia’s English-language state media as a strategic messaging platform, and the mobilization of social media bots and trolls to spread disinformation and amplify Russian messaging.”

[adrotate banner=”9″]

Pierluigi Paganini

(Security Affairs – Russian Hackers, 2016 Presidential election)

[adrotate banner=”13″]

Pierluigi Paganini

Pierluigi Paganini is member of the ENISA (European Union Agency for Network and Information Security) Threat Landscape Stakeholder Group and Cyber G7 Group, he is also a Security Evangelist, Security Analyst and Freelance Writer. Editor-in-Chief at "Cyber Defense Magazine", Pierluigi is a cyber security expert with over 20 years experience in the field, he is Certified Ethical Hacker at EC Council in London. The passion for writing and a strong belief that security is founded on sharing and awareness led Pierluigi to find the security blog "Security Affairs" recently named a Top National Security Resource for US. Pierluigi is a member of the "The Hacker News" team and he is a writer for some major publications in the field such as Cyber War Zone, ICTTF, Infosec Island, Infosec Institute, The Hacker News Magazine and for many other Security magazines. Author of the Books "The Deep Dark Web" and “Digital Virtual Currency and Bitcoin”.

Recent Posts

SinoTrack GPS device flaws allow remote vehicle control and location tracking

Two vulnerabilities in SinoTrack GPS devices can allow remote vehicle control and location tracking by…

8 hours ago

U.S. CISA adds Wazuh, and WebDAV flaws to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog

U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) adds Wazuh, and WebDAV flaws to its Known…

11 hours ago

Exposed eyes: 40,000 security cameras vulnerable to remote hacking

Over 40,000 internet-exposed security cameras worldwide are vulnerable to remote hacking, posing serious privacy and…

12 hours ago

Operation Secure: INTERPOL dismantles 20,000+ malicious IPs in major cybercrime crackdown

INTERPOL announced that a joint operation code-named Operation Secure took down 20,000+ malicious IPs/domains tied…

22 hours ago

Over 80,000 servers hit as Roundcube RCE bug gets rapidly exploited

A critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in Roundcube was exploited days after patch, impacting…

1 day ago

A flaw could allow recovery of the phone number associated with any Google account

A vulnerability could allow recovery of the phone number associated with a Google account by…

2 days ago