• Home
  • Cyber Crime
  • Cyber warfare
  • APT
  • Data Breach
  • Deep Web
  • Digital ID
  • Hacking
  • Hacktivism
  • Intelligence
  • Internet of Things
  • Laws and regulations
  • Malware
  • Mobile
  • Reports
  • Security
  • Social Networks
  • Terrorism
  • ICS-SCADA
  • POLICIES
  • Contact me
MUST READ

Critical FortiSIEM flaw under active exploitation, Fortinet warns

 | 

Charon Ransomware targets Middle East with APT attack methods

 | 

Hackers leak 2.8M sensitive records from Allianz Life in Salesforce data breach

 | 

SAP fixed 26 flaws in August 2025 Update, including 4 Critical

 | 

August 2025 Patch Tuesday fixes a Windows Kerberos Zero-Day

 | 

Dutch NCSC: Citrix NetScaler zero-day breaches critical orgs

 | 

Chrome sandbox escape nets security researcher $250,000 reward

 | 

Smart Buses flaws expose vehicles to tracking, control, and spying

 | 

MedusaLocker ransomware group is looking for pentesters

 | 

Google confirms Salesforce CRM breach, faces extortion threat

 | 

SECURITY AFFAIRS MALWARE NEWSLETTER ROUND 57

 | 

Security Affairs newsletter Round 536 by Pierluigi Paganini – INTERNATIONAL EDITION

 | 

Embargo Ransomware nets $34.2M in crypto since April 2024

 | 

Germany limits police spyware use to serious crimes

 | 

Phishing attacks exploit WinRAR flaw CVE-2025-8088 to install RomCom

 | 

French firm Bouygues Telecom suffered a data breach impacting 6.4M customers

 | 

Columbia University data breach impacted 868,969 people

 | 

SonicWall dismisses zero-day fears after Ransomware probe

 | 

Air France and KLM disclosed data breaches following the hack of a third-party platform

 | 

CISA, Microsoft warn of critical Exchange hybrid flaw CVE-2025-53786

 | 
  • Home
  • Cyber Crime
  • Cyber warfare
  • APT
  • Data Breach
  • Deep Web
  • Digital ID
  • Hacking
  • Hacktivism
  • Intelligence
  • Internet of Things
  • Laws and regulations
  • Malware
  • Mobile
  • Reports
  • Security
  • Social Networks
  • Terrorism
  • ICS-SCADA
  • POLICIES
  • Contact me
  • Home
  • Breaking News
  • Cyber warfare
  • Laws and regulations
  • Malware
  • Merck settles with insurers regarding a $1.4 billion claim over NotPetya damages

Merck settles with insurers regarding a $1.4 billion claim over NotPetya damages

Pierluigi Paganini January 06, 2024

Merck has resolved a dispute with insurers regarding a $1.4 billion claim arising from the NotPetya malware incident.

Merck and its insurers have agreed with a $1.4 billion claim arising from the large-scale NotPetya cyberattack.

Merck & Co., Inc., known as Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD) outside the United States and Canada, is an American multinational pharmaceutical company. It is one of the largest pharmaceutical companies globally, engaged in the research, development, manufacturing, and marketing of a wide range of healthcare products.

Merck filed a $1.4 billion insurance claim for the losses caused by the NotPetya attack that took place in 2017. In August 2017, the pharmaceutical company revealed that the massive NotPetya cyberattack disrupted its worldwide operations.

The news was part of Merck’s financial results announcement for the second quarter of 2017, according to the pharmaceutical giant the ransomware destructed operations in several critical sectors, including manufacturing, research, and sales.

The analysis conducted on the ransomware revealed it was designed to look like ransomware but was wiper malware designed for sabotage purposes.

Attackers might have used a diversionary strategy to hide a state-sponsored attack carried out by Russia on Ukraine critical infrastructure.

Experts from Kaspersky’s conducted a similar research that led to a similar conclusion.

Unlike other ransomware, Petya does not encrypt files on the infected systems but targets the hard drive’s master file table (MFT) and renders the master boot record (MBR) inoperable.

Merck had not taken out specific insurance to cover cyber attacks, it only had insurance coverage against general risks.

The NotPetya attack was considered by many cyber security experts as an act of silverware against Ukraine, however, it caused billions of dollars of losses to organizations worldwide.

These organizations were not the real targets of the attack, and insurers claimed that the damage was caused by an act of war explicitly excluded by the insurance.

In January 2022, Judge Thomas J. Walsh of the New Jersey Superior Court ruled in favor of the pharmaceutical firm. The judge ruled that it was not correct to apply the clause that excluded the damage caused by an act of war. The insurers appealed, but in May, the Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division ruled in favor of Merck in its $1.4 billion claim against the insurers.

The Judge did not recognize the attribution of the attack to a nation-state actor, but the insurers appealed again without success.

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Faceboo and Mastodon

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, NotPetya)


facebook linkedin twitter

Hacking hacking news information security news IT Information Security malware Merck notpetya Pierluigi Paganini Security Affairs Security News

you might also like

Pierluigi Paganini August 13, 2025
Critical FortiSIEM flaw under active exploitation, Fortinet warns
Read more
Pierluigi Paganini August 13, 2025
Charon Ransomware targets Middle East with APT attack methods
Read more

leave a comment

newsletter

Subscribe to my email list and stay
up-to-date!

    recent articles

    Critical FortiSIEM flaw under active exploitation, Fortinet warns

    Hacking / August 13, 2025

    Charon Ransomware targets Middle East with APT attack methods

    Malware / August 13, 2025

    Hackers leak 2.8M sensitive records from Allianz Life in Salesforce data breach

    Data Breach / August 13, 2025

    SAP fixed 26 flaws in August 2025 Update, including 4 Critical

    Uncategorized / August 13, 2025

    August 2025 Patch Tuesday fixes a Windows Kerberos Zero-Day

    Hacking / August 12, 2025

    To contact me write an email to:

    Pierluigi Paganini :
    pierluigi.paganini@securityaffairs.co

    LEARN MORE

    QUICK LINKS

    • Home
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber warfare
    • APT
    • Data Breach
    • Deep Web
    • Digital ID
    • Hacking
    • Hacktivism
    • Intelligence
    • Internet of Things
    • Laws and regulations
    • Malware
    • Mobile
    • Reports
    • Security
    • Social Networks
    • Terrorism
    • ICS-SCADA
    • POLICIES
    • Contact me

    Copyright@securityaffairs 2024

    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
    Cookie SettingsAccept All
    Manage consent

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities...
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    Non-necessary
    Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
    SAVE & ACCEPT